Link to USGS home page
125 years of science for America 1879-2004
Sound Waves Monthly Newsletter - Coastal Science and Research News from Across the USGS
Home || Sections: Spotlight on Sandy | Fieldwork | Research | Outreach | Meetings | Awards | Staff & Center News | Publications || Archives


Human Influence on Diatom Productivity and Sedimentation in Chesapeake Bay

in this issue:
 previous story | next story

A paper entitled "Anthropogenically Induced Changes in Sediment and Biogenic Silica Fluxes in Chesapeake Bay," written by Steve Colman and John Bratton, has been published in the journal Geology (January 2003).

The paper, which addresses fundamental science questions related to reconstructing past environmental conditions, has many applied-science, ecosystem-management implications. It provides continuous, well-dated records of total-sediment and biogenic-silica fluxes from well before the arrival of Europeans to the present.

Previous attempts to address these questions have been hampered by poor dating, short records that do not extend to presettlement times, or measurements that allow only concentration, rather than flux, calculations. Owing to these problems, many studies of ecosystems and the geologic and biogeochemical processes that affect them fail to place their conclusions within a long-term context. The state of the system and its natural variability before its disturbance by human activity are critical for truly understanding the effects of humans on ecosystems.

Here is the paper's abstract:

"Sediment cores as long as 20 m, dated by 14C, 210Pb, and 137Cs methods and pollen stratigraphy, provide a history of diatom productivity and sediment accumulation rates in Chesapeake Bay. We calculated the flux of biogenic silica and total sediment for the past 1,500 years for two high-sedimentation-rate sites in the mesohaline section of the bay. The data show that biogenic silica flux to sediments, an index of diatom productivity in the bay, as well as its variability, was relatively low before European settlement of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In the succeeding 300-400 years, the flux of biogenic silica has increased by a factor of 4 to 5. Biogenic silica fluxes still appear to be increasing, despite recent nutrient-reduction efforts. The increase in diatom-produced biogenic silica has been partly masked (in concentration terms) by a similar increase in total-sediment flux. This history suggests the magnitude of anthropogenic disturbance of the estuary and indicates that significant changes had occurred long before the 20th century."

in this issue:
 previous story | next story


Mailing List:

print this issue print this issue

in this issue:
Research cover story:
Competitive Edge of Invasive Species

Lake Mead Work Continues

Outreach Dolphin Rescue

London Interns Tour St. Pete

Congressional Briefing on Gas Hydrates

Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety

Science Mentoring

Meetings Coastal Vulnerability

Lidar Data and Technology

International Deep-Sea Corals Workshop

Northeastern Coastal Ecosystems and Resources Workshop

Awards Shinn Wins 2002 Shoemaker Distinguished Achievement Award

Coastal and Marine Scientists Win 2002 Shoemaker Product Excellence Awards

Behrendt and Poag Elected AAAS Fellows

Normark Awarded Keen Medal

Staff & Center News A Tribute to Joe Newell

Marine Geophysics Pioneer Honored

Celebrating Careers of Five Retirees

Manheim Lectures on Trends in Scientific and Technological Innovation

Publications San Francisco Bay Earthquake Hazards

Effectivenes of Marine Reserves in Central California

Human Influence on Diatom Productivity and Sedimentation in Chesapeake Bay

Feb. / Mar. Publications List U. S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Sound Waves Monthly Newsletter

email Feedback | USGS privacy statement | Disclaimer | Accessibility

This page is
Updated May 06, 2014 @ 02:11 PM (THF)