Link to USGS home page
Sound Waves Monthly Newsletter - Coastal Science and Research News from Across the USGS
Home || Sections: Spotlight on Sandy | Fieldwork | Research | Outreach | Meetings | Awards | Staff & Center News | Publications || Archives

 

Fieldwork

Three-Week Expedition Images Sediments Beneath the Gulf of Alaska



in this issue:
 previous story | next story

Research vessel Marcus G. Langseth
Above: Research vessel Marcus G. Langseth. Photograph courtesy of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. [larger version]

Gulf of Alaska seafloor, showing June 2011 cruise tracks and ocean-bottom seismometer locations.
Above: Gulf of Alaska seafloor, showing June 2011 cruise tracks and ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) locations. Data were collected along primary multichannel seismic (MCS) reflection lines (red) to measure sediment thickness in support of delimiting U.S. extended continental shelf according to the Convention on the Law of the Sea; OBS refraction lines (orange) were placed to establish speed of sound in sediment layers of the Baranof fan system; additional MCS reflection lines (purple) were run during extra time available at the end of the cruise. nm, nautical mile; EEZ, Exclusive Economic Zone (extends approximately 200 nm from shore or to a maritime boundary with another nation); 350 nm, the limit beyond which a nation's extended continental shelf may not extend; DSDP, Deep Sea Drilling Program; ODP, Ocean Drilling Program. Bathymetric data in northeast part of gulf were acquired in 2005 by the University of New Hampshire's Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping/Joint Hydrographic Center. [larger version]

seismic-reflection image
Above: Preliminary migrated seismic-reflection image of MCS Line 9 from the June 2011 Langseth cruise, showing some of the thickest sediment observed anywhere in the Gulf of Alaska, located beyond 200 nm from the Alaska baseline in the Baranof channel and fan system. The sedimentary layers shown here are more than 1.5 km thick. [larger version]

David Twichell and Nathaniel Above: Chirp 3.5-kHz subbottom profile from the June 2011 Langseth cruise, showing more than 60 m of sound-signal penetration in the vicinity of the southwest edge of the Baranof fan system. Profile shows a modern channel and levee running along the very edge of the vast Baranof system. Aggradational fan channels, such as this one, appear to build the margin upward and outward over time. Profile is located at the south end of MCS line 11. [larger version]

In June 2011, scientists aboard the research vessel Marcus G. Langseth acquired detailed images of sediment layers and volcanic bedrock beneath the Gulf of Alaska. This research cruise was the first opportunity for the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to conduct scientific investigations of the central Gulf of Alaska in more than 20 years, since the GLORIA mapping program in 1989.

The primary objective was to determine the thickness of sediment along the outer parts of the Surveyor and Baranof submarine fans—delta-like piles of sediment deposited by underwater avalanches called turbidites. The scientists sought to determine whether the outer fans have sufficient sediment thickness to satisfy the criteria for U.S. "extended continental shelf"—where the nation can exercise sovereign rights over resources on and beneath the seabed according to the international Convention on the Law of the Sea. (For more information, see http://continentalshelf.gov/.)

Additional objectives were to improve understanding of the geology of this remote and little-imaged part of the ocean, to explore the processes and structures that control the distribution and movement of seafloor sediment in this region, to understand the interaction between sediment pathways and basement topography (the shape of the bedrock surface buried beneath the sediment), and to help refine the history of climatic and tectonic influences on the development of these deep-water sediment fans. Preliminary observations indicate that ridges, valleys, and other elements of the bedrock surface long buried beneath the sediment continue to control the locations of channels and other features on the seafloor.

Leading the cruise were chief scientist Ginger Barth, a USGS geophysicist, and co-chief scientist Sean Gulick, a research scientist from the Institute for Geophysics (UTIG) in the Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin. Also onboard for this science mission were USGS geophysicists Jonathan Childs, Patrick Hart, and Ray Sliter; USGS sound-source mechanic Jenny White; UTIG geophysicists Bobby Reece, Ryan Lester, Maureen LeVoir, and Kevin Johnson; and University of Wyoming geophysicist Erik Everson. Aboard the support vessel Norseman II, USGS scientists George Tate, Dennis Mann, and Diane Minasian, along with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution seismic-instrument technicians David DuBois and Timothy Kane, completed the science party.

A multichannel seismic-reflection system, commonly abbreviated as a "multichannel seismic" or "MCS" system, was the main tool used to collect data during the cruise. Similar to an echosounder, a seismic-reflection system makes use of sound energy, which travels easily through water and rock and reflects off boundaries between materials with differing acoustic properties. Examples are the boundary between water and sediment (the seafloor), the boundaries between sediment layers of different materials (for example, sand versus mud), and the boundary between sediment and hard volcanic rock (the geologic "basement"). Seismic-reflection systems use sound energy at frequencies that enable the sound to penetrate deep (as much as several kilometers) beneath the seafloor and bounce off boundaries between sub-seafloor layers. The resulting "profile" is a cross-sectional view of the geologic layers beneath the seafloor, similar to what you might see in a canyon wall. The MCS data-acquisition system towed behind the Langseth during the June 2011 cruise consisted of an array of 36 pneumatic sound sources, or "air guns," to generate the sound energy and an 8-km-long streamer containing 636 groups, or "channels," of hydrophones (underwater microphones) to receive the echoes.

During the cruise, the scientists collected 3,321 km of seismic-reflection profiles along the ship's track. Fortuitously, the hydrophones also recorded seismic waves from a magnitude 7.2 earthquake that struck the Fox Islands in Alaska's Aleutian Island chain on June 24, 2011. In addition to seismic-reflection data, the scientists collected approximately 3,800 km of trackline gravity and magnetic data, multibeam bathymetric data, and chirp subbottom profiles. Like MCS reflection profiles, chirp subbottom profiles are cross-sectional views of sedimentary layers. Produced by higher-frequency sound energy, chirp subbottom profiles provide greater detail than MCS reflection profiles but do not extend nearly as deep beneath the seafloor.

To correctly interpret seismic-reflection data, scientists need to know the speed of sound in the sub-seafloor layers, which varies with such factors as porosity, grain size, and rock type. Variation in the speed of sound causes sound waves to bend, or "refract," as they move through different layers. Ocean-bottom seismometers (OBS) helped the scientists pick up refracted sound energy. (Learn more about ocean-bottom seismometers at http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/operations/obs/whatobs.html.) Thirteen days into the cruise, the research vessel Norseman II rendezvoused with Langseth and deployed 15 ocean-bottom seismometers along two lines, each approximately 200 km long. Data recorded by the ocean-bottom seismometers will be used to calculate the speed of sound in the sub-seafloor layers, which will allow the scientists to calibrate their interpretations of the seismic-reflection images and to develop hypotheses about the nature of the sediment in the various layers and the underlying volcanic rocks of the oceanic crust.

The June cruise yielded a valuable dataset that will allow scientists to reconstruct many aspects of sediment routing and climate and tectonic history in the Gulf of Alaska region. Two major scientific results already evident from this study involve the significance of basement topography—the shape of the bedrock beneath the sediment layers. First, the Kodiak-Bowie seamount province is considerably broader and more voluminous than is evident from a bathymetric map. Sediments are surprisingly thin landward of the Kodiak-Bowies, as the basement itself is shallower than expected, and many significant seamounts (with original elevations greater than 1 km) are buried just beneath the sediment surface. Second, sediment routing throughout the vast Gulf of Alaska appears to be profoundly shaped by basement structure, even long after the primary basement topography has been completely buried. This relation holds true for features of the Surveyor and Baranof fans on a regional scale and over the course of many millions of years, as evidenced by stacked channel systems whose placement was originally controlled by fracture-zone ridges and troughs and by irregular barriers within now-buried groups of seamounts.

The data will also support further development of an Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) proposal to drill a research hole in the Gulf of Alaska, add to a growing number of seismic oceanography datasets, and contribute to the understanding of earthquake and tsunami processes on the Alaska margin.

 

Related Web Sites
Extended Continental Shelf Project
U.S. Extended Continental Shelf Task Force

in this issue:
 previous story | next story

 

Mailing List:


print this issue print this issue

in this issue:

Fieldwork
cover story:
Arctic Ocean Research: Polar Ocean Acidification Study

Expedition Images Gulf of Alaska Sediments

Research
U.S. West Coast Winter 2009-10 Erosion Spike

Outreach
USGS Valuable Partner in St. Petersburg Science Festival

Awards Award for Poster on Web Access to USGS Core Repository

Publications Arctic Study Evaluates Outer Continental Shelf Energy Development

August 2011 Publications


FirstGov.gov U. S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Sound Waves Monthly Newsletter

email Feedback | USGS privacy statement | Disclaimer | Accessibility

This page is http://soundwaves.usgs.gov/2011/08/fieldwork2.html
Updated April 15, 2014 @ 01:53 PM (JSG)